• Home
  • Tag: 上海大学城附近spa

A week of campaign against the Senate vote on the Cybersecurity Act of 2012

first_img NSO Group hasn’t kept its promises on human rights, RSF and other NGOs say to go further August 1, 2012 – Updated on January 20, 2016 A week of campaign against the Senate vote on the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 RSF_en Help by sharing this information Follow the news on United States United StatesAmericas News United StatesAmericas June 3, 2021 Find out more Organisation center_img News News News Facebook’s Oversight Board is just a stopgap, regulation urgently needed, RSF says Receive email alerts June 7, 2021 Find out more WhatsApp blocks accounts of at least seven Gaza Strip journalists This week, as the Cybersecurity Act (CSA) moves to the Senate floor, Reporters Without Borders is joining a wide-ranging coalition of digital rights groups and advocates to launch the second Stop Cyber Spying campaign. The campaign will encourage individuals to contact their Senators in support of amendments to CSA that would better safeguard privacy. The Stop Cyber Spying coalition supports an amendment from Senators Al Franken and Rand Paul that would ensure companies do not have new, overboard authority to monitor and block private communications.The coalition also opposes attempts to remove privacy protections in the bill, including any amendments that would hand the reins of America’s cybersecurity systems to a secretive military intelligence agency like the NSA, which is not accountable to the public for what it does with our private data. Last April, a similar coalition joined forces for the original Stop Cyber Spying campaign, a week of action in opposition to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, otherwise known as CISPA. Ultimately, CISPA passed the House of Representatives, but not before major outcry that helped lead to substantial privacy improvements, a veto threat from the White House, and a significant number of “no” votes on a bill that previously looked poised to sail through with little opposition. The Stop Cyber Spying campaign now hopes to beat back floor amendments to the CSA that could make the bill look more like CISPA.The Twitter hashtag for the campaign is #DefendPrivacy. April 28, 2021 Find out morelast_img read more

‘Non-Application Of Mind By Police Which Goes To The Extent Of Vindictiveness’ : Delhi Court Grants Bail To Activist Khalid Saifi In Riots Case [Read Order]

first_imgNews Updates’Non-Application Of Mind By Police Which Goes To The Extent Of Vindictiveness’ : Delhi Court Grants Bail To Activist Khalid Saifi In Riots Case [Read Order] Karan Tripathi4 Nov 2020 7:32 AMShare This – xA Delhi court on Wednesday granted bail to ‘United Against Hate’ activist Khalid Saifi in a case related to the February riots in northeast Delhi.”In my humble opinion, chargesheeting the applicant in this case on the basis of such an insignificant material is total non-application of mind by the police which goes to the extent of vindictiveness”, observed Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginA Delhi court on Wednesday granted bail to ‘United Against Hate’ activist Khalid Saifi in a case related to the February riots in northeast Delhi.”In my humble opinion, chargesheeting the applicant in this case on the basis of such an insignificant material is total non-application of mind by the police which goes to the extent of vindictiveness”, observed Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav of Karkardooma Court.The observation was made while referring to the oral evidence relied on by the Delhi police to allege that he was part of conspiracy behind Delhi riots. The witness had told the police that he had seen Saifi dropping Tahir Hussain(who is accused of murder of IB officer Ankit Sharma) outside a building on February 27 and thereafter had seen Saifi and Umar Khalid going into the building.In this regard, the judge observed :”The sole evidence of this so called conspiracy is a statement of PW Rahul Kasana, wherein he stated on 27.09.2020 that he was standing outside a building in the area of Shaheen Bagh, where he had dropped principal accused Tahir Hussain and thereafter he saw applicant and Umar Khalid going into the same building. I fail to understand from the aforesaid statement how a lofty claim of conspiracy can be inferred”.The court noted that if the principal accused, Tahir Hussain, was moved or actuated by Saifi in the meeting, then Saifi should have been made co-accused in ten other cases like Hussain, “which is not the case”.The court said it has nowhere been the case of the prosecution that Saifi was physically present at the scene of crime on the day of the incident and he has not been seen in any CCTV footage/viral videos of the matter.The applicant (Saifi) has merely been roped in the matter on the basis of his own disclosure statement and fourth disclosure statement of co-accused Tahir Hussain. Even no recovery of any sort has been effected from the applicant pursuant to his disclosure statement, it said.The Court further observed that the investigation in the matter is complete and chargesheet has already been filed.”The trial in the matter is likely to take long time. The applicant cannot be made to incarcerate in jail for infinity merely on account of the fact that other persons who were part of the riotous mob have to be identified and arrested in the matter”, said the Court.Saifi was arrested on February 26 in a case registered at Jagatpuri police station in relation to Delhi riots. Later, on March 21, he was arrested in FIR No. 59/2020 which is registered by the Delhi Police Special Cell for larger conspiracy behind Delhi riots. It was on June 6 that he was arrested in the FIR relating to the present case (FIR No.101/202 of Khajuri Khas Police Station). The said FIR was for offences relating to unlawful assembly, rioting, destruction of public and private properties at Khajuri Khas(offences under Sections 109/114/147/148/149/153-A/186/212/353/395/427/435/436/452/454/505/34/120-B IPC r/w Sections 3/4 PDPP Act & Sections 25/27 Arms Act).The court granted him bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs 20,000 with one surety of like amount. The applicant/accused Khalid Saifi was represented by Ld. Sr. Adv. Ms. Rebecca John along with Advs. Shri Bhavook Chauhan, Shri Rajat Kumar, Shri Harsh Bora, Ms. Pravita Kashyap, Shri Tushar Yadav and Shri Syed Atif. Ld. Special PP Shri Manoj Chaudhary appeared for the State along with IO, Inspector Sunil Kumar and ACP Pankaj.Click Here to Download Order[Read Order]Subscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more